Calcutta rape case: Supreme Court orders financial probe, Wikipedia to remove names | News from India

Read also: Calcutta rape case: Supreme Court allows live streaming of case as hearing begins

CBI investigation delayed by “five days”

The CBI said there was a delay due to a “five-day gap” between the crime and the start of the investigation, which hampered progress. Despite this, the agency has made several key arrests, including the hospital’s director and the local Station House Officer (SHO). More arrests and findings are expected as the investigation continues.

Concerns about the autopsy procedures

One area identified as problematic by the CBI is whether statutory post-mortem procedures were properly followed. Investigators are also looking into whether there was any tampering at the crime scene or attempts to destroy key evidence. Chief Justice Chandrachud confirmed that the victim’s father had provided clues that could help in the investigation and the CBI was encouraged to take these clues into account.

Hiring of contract staff

In addition to the criminal investigation, the Supreme Court also raised questions about the security measures in place for doctors and staff in hospitals in West Bengal. The court criticised the West Bengal government for its decision to hire contractual staff for hospital security and questioned the effectiveness of such measures, questioning whether this approach adequately protects healthcare workers.

Wikipedia was ordered to remove the victim’s name

Furthermore, the court directed Wikipedia to remove the victim’s name from its platform to protect her privacy. The order came after the top court was informed that the website had used the aspiring doctor’s name and created an image of the victim even though the investigation was ongoing.

Discontinuation of the “Rattierer Saathi” programme

The Supreme Court had earlier raised concerns over the scheme, which is part of the state’s ‘Rattierer Saathi’ scheme. The state government was asked to withdraw its notification limiting duty hours for women doctors under the scheme, which mandates avoiding night shifts. The court warned that such measures could hamper the careers of women doctors and create unequal working conditions in hospitals. The West Bengal government, which appeared before the court, has indicated that it will withdraw its controversial notification.

Investigations are ongoing

While the investigation continues, the Supreme Court is cautious not to reveal too much information at this stage, aware that premature disclosure could hamper the discovery of crucial evidence. Chief Justice Chandrachud reiterated that the court’s primary concern was to ensure that the “absolute truth” comes out.

The CBI has been asked to provide an updated status report as the investigation progresses and the court will closely monitor further developments in the case. Meanwhile, the West Bengal government’s policies regarding hospital staff and security will continue to be closely examined as the case progresses.

First published: September 17, 2024 | 2:03 p.m. IS