Debate over race in admissions at the US Naval Academy

The U.S. Naval Academy is under scrutiny as its lawyers defend the consideration of race in admissions, emphasizing that diversity strengthens military effectiveness. That debate comes amid a civil case in Maryland initiated by Students for Fair Admissions, a group also known for challenging affirmative action in a landmark Supreme Court case.

During the trial, presided over by Judge Richard Bennett, several senior military officials gave conflicting testimony. While some argue that ethnic diversity is critical to cohesion and effectiveness, others, like Lt. Col. Dakota Wood, believe that performance standards are more important than race or ethnicity.

The case has reignited the debate about race and its role in military admissions, exposing deep-seated tensions and differing viewpoints. The court’s decision, which is expected to be appealed, could have far-reaching implications for the future of military and college admissions policies.

(With contributions from agencies.)